Vivo S17 Pro vs Vivo V29 Pro

The Vivo S17 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Vivo V29 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200. Both devices score the same overall rating of 60/100. Key differences: the Vivo S17 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,240,821 vs 1,117,927); the Vivo S17 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo V29 Pro doesn't.

Both devices scored the same rating of 60/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo S17 Pro

Performance 64
Display 84
Camera 48
Battery 47
Portability 72
Value for money —

Vivo V29 Pro

Performance 63
Display 84
Camera 48
Battery 47
Portability 72
Value for money —

What makes Vivo S17 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1240821 vs 1117927

  • Higher performance (64/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo V29 Pro better?


  • Overall rating 60/100

Comparison verdict

The Vivo S17 Pro and the Vivo V29 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 60/100. In the "performance" category, the Vivo S17 Pro and the Vivo V29 Pro are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 48/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100. In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 72/100.

Vivo S17 Pro: The Vivo S17 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo V29 Pro: The Vivo V29 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo S17 Pro Vivo V29 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8200 MediaTek Dimensity 8200
AnTuTu 1240821 1117927
Geekbench Single 1239 1239
Geekbench Multi 3962 3962
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 4600 mAh
Charging 80W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 12 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 13, OriginOS 3 Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 13
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits —
NFC yes no
Dimensions 164.2×74.4×7.5 mm 164.2×74.4×7.5 mm
Weight 188 g 188 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Vivo S17 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 50MP
48
camera

Vivo V29 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 50MP
48
camera

Display comparison

Vivo S17 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo V29 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Vivo S17 Pro

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
47
battery

Vivo V29 Pro

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
47
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo S17 Pro and Vivo V29 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo S17 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200
60/100
1240821 AnTuTu
Vivo V29 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200
60/100 -11.0%
1117927 AnTuTu

Vivo S17 Pro leads Vivo V29 Pro by 11.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo S17 Pro and the Vivo V29 Pro are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 48/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 72/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo S17 Pro or the Vivo V29 Pro?

Both devices scored 60/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo S17 Pro (64/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo S17 Pro and the Vivo V29 Pro?

The Vivo S17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo V29 Pro — 60/100.

Should you choose the Vivo S17 Pro over the Vivo V29 Pro?

The Vivo S17 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo V29 Pro is a better fit for active users.