Vivo S16 vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Vivo S16 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16 leads — 39/100 vs 22/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE V40 Pro has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4600); the Vivo S16 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't.
Vivo S16
ZTE V40 Pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 65W
- Lighter: 182g vs 190g
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 62/100)
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Vivo S16 vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Vivo S16 scores 17 points higher (39/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 leads (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S16 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (72/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo S16 | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Origin OS 3 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo S16
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo S16
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S16 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (72/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo S16 is noticeably better than the ZTE V40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo S16 and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo S16 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo S16 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo S16 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S16 over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo S16 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.