Vivo S15 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Vivo S15 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 108 MP.
Vivo S15
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 65W
- Lighter: 197g vs 199g
- Better camera (48/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Vivo S15 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S15 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S15 is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Vivo S15 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.3×8.0 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo S15
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S15
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo S15
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo S15 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S15 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S15 is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S15 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Vivo S15 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo S15 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo S15 has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Should you choose the Vivo S15 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo S15 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.