Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) vs ZTE Blade V50 Vita
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200, while the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (2023) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads — 30/100 vs 25/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade V50 Vita has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the ZTE Blade V50 Vita has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is noticeably lighter (188g vs 204g).
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 204g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) vs the ZTE Blade V50 Vita, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) scores 5 points higher (30/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the ZTE Blade V50 Vita are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100. In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (65/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | ZTE Blade V50 Vita | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | 167.4×76.0×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | $210 |
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the ZTE Blade V50 Vita are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (65/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) or the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) edges out the ZTE Blade V50 Vita by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita — 25/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) over the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V50 Vita is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.