Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro vs Vivo Y500i
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200, while the Vivo Y500i (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. Both devices score the same overall rating of 33/100. Key differences: the Vivo Y500i has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo Y500i has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 219g).
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Vivo Y500i
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 175g vs 219g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Vivo Y500i received the same MobileRank rating — 33/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500i leads (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500i leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500i notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500i (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500i significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | Vivo Y500i | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 560863 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2249 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1570 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 219 g | |
| Price | — | $180 |
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y500i
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500i
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y500i
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500i notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (57/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500i (81/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500i significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro or the Vivo Y500i?
Both devices scored 33/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo Y500i.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Vivo Y500i?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y500i — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro or the Vivo Y500i?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro over the Vivo Y500i?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y500i is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.