Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) vs Vivo Y300 Plus
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the Vivo Y300 Plus (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 Plus leads — 33/100 vs 31/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 Plus has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 Plus doesn't; the Vivo Y300 Plus is noticeably lighter (172g vs 194g).
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
Vivo Y300 Plus
- Faster charging: 80W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 31/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 172g vs 194g
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 39/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) vs the Vivo Y300 Plus, the Vivo Y300 Plus scores 2 points higher (33/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) | Vivo Y300 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2003 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 650 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.8×8.6 mm | 164.4×74.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 172 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y300 Plus
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 Plus
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 Plus
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (85/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) or the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Vivo Y300 Plus edges out the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo Y300 Plus — 33/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) over the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 Plus is a better fit for everyday use.