Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) vs Vivo Y200t
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300, while the Vivo Y200t (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 51/100 vs 49/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is faster in AnTuTu (954,090 vs 737,054); the Vivo Y200t is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Vivo Y200t
What makes Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 954090 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 1114 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3281 vs 2700
- Higher performance (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 30/100)
What makes Vivo Y200t better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 203g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) vs the Vivo Y200t, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 2 points higher (51/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Vivo Y200t are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100. In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200t notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (60/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | Vivo Y200t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 954090 | 737054 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1114 | 930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3281 | 2700 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | 165.7×76.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y200t
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200t
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200t
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and Vivo Y200t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads Vivo Y200t by 29.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Vivo Y200t are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200t notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (60/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) or the Vivo Y200t?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) edges out the Vivo Y200t by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Vivo Y200t?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo Y200t — 49/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) or the Vivo Y200t?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads on performance (58/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) over the Vivo Y200t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y200t (60/100 vs 44/100).