Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) vs Vivo T4R
The Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, while the Vivo T4R (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo T4R leads — 55/100 vs 51/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5700); the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T4R doesn't; the Vivo T4R is noticeably lighter (183g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)
Vivo T4R
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5700 mAh
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo T4R better?
- Lighter: 183g vs 219g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 65/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) vs the Vivo T4R, the Vivo T4R scores 4 points higher (55/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 57/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo T4R significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) (76/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) | Vivo T4R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | 953150 | 953150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2344 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | 163.3×76.7×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | $230 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo T4R
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo T4R
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T4R
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) and Vivo T4R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 57/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo T4R significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) (76/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) or the Vivo T4R?
The Vivo T4R edges out the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) and the Vivo T4R?
The Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo T4R — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) or the Vivo T4R?
The Vivo T4R leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z11x (China) over the Vivo T4R?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo T4R (76/100 vs 43/100).