Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 108 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
ZTE Axon 40 pro
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.