Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
The Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 leads — 59/100 vs 57/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4650); the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE is noticeably lighter (190g vs 218g).
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4650 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 218g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 32/100)
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (45/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 5, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 scores 2 points higher (59/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 (59/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4650 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | 163.8×76.3×10.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE and Xiaomi Black Shark 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 (59/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5?
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5?
The Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 — 59/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5?
The Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is a better fit for active users.