Vivo iQOO 16 vs ZTE Voyage 40 5G
VS
A full comparison of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the ZTE Voyage 40 5G is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Voyage 40 5G to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Performance
100
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
90
Portability
42
Value for money
92
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
Performance
—
Display
—
Camera
10
Battery
52
Portability
46
Value for money
—
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
What makes ZTE Voyage 40 5G better?
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | ZTE Voyage 40 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Unisoc T7520 (Tanggula T760) | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | — | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 163.6×75.2×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | — | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
10
cameraDisplay comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
displayZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Refresh rate: —
—
displayBattery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
90
batteryZTE Voyage 40 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
52
battery