Vivo iQOO 16 vs ZTE Blade V40 Vita
The Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 34/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 333,647); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade V40 Vita doesn't; the Vivo iQOO 16 is thinner (8.3mm vs 9.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 333647
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1335
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 35/100)
What makes ZTE Blade V40 Vita better?
- Lighter: 214g vs 223g
- Overall rating 34/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 vs the ZTE Blade V40 Vita, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 55 points higher (89/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (100/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (78/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (42/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | ZTE Blade V40 Vita | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | 333647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO 16 and ZTE Blade V40 Vita, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads ZTE Blade V40 Vita by 1548.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (100/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (99/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (78/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita (90/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (42/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the ZTE Blade V40 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Vita by 55 points (89/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the ZTE Blade V40 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO 16 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the ZTE Blade V40 Vita — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the ZTE Blade V40 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the ZTE Blade V40 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 16 over the ZTE Blade V40 Vita?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.