Vivo iQOO 16 vs ZTE Blade A54
VS
A full comparison of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the ZTE Blade A54 is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A54 to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Performance
100
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
90
Portability
42
Value for money
92
ZTE Blade A54
Performance
—
Display
44
Camera
—
Battery
52
Portability
62
Value for money
—
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
What makes ZTE Blade A54 better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 223g
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | ZTE Blade A54 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 164.0×75.8×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraZTE Blade A54
- Main: —
- Front: 2MP
—
cameraDisplay comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
displayZTE Blade A54
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
displayBattery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
90
batteryZTE Blade A54
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
52
battery