Vivo iQOO 16 vs ZTE Blade A53+
VS
A full comparison of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the ZTE Blade A53+ is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A53+ to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Performance
100
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
90
Portability
42
Value for money
92
ZTE Blade A53+
Performance
—
Display
—
Camera
10
Battery
32
Portability
22
Value for money
—
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
What makes ZTE Blade A53+ better?
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | ZTE Blade A53+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Spreadtrum Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | — | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 165.7×76.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | — | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraZTE Blade A53+
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
10
cameraDisplay comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
displayZTE Blade A53+
- Refresh rate: —
—
displayBattery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
90
batteryZTE Blade A53+
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
32
battery