Vivo iQOO 16 vs ZTE Axon 50 Lite
VS
A full comparison of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the ZTE Axon 50 Lite is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Axon 50 Lite to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Performance
100
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
90
Portability
42
Value for money
92
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
Performance
—
Display
—
Camera
31
Battery
43
Portability
48
Value for money
—
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
What makes ZTE Axon 50 Lite better?
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | ZTE Axon 50 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | — | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 165.0×76.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | — | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraZTE Axon 50 Lite
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
31
cameraDisplay comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
displayZTE Axon 50 Lite
- 6.6"
- Refresh rate: —
—
displayBattery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
90
batteryZTE Axon 50 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
43
battery