Vivo iQOO 16 vs Xiaomi Mi CC9e
The Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 36/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4030); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 329,457); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e doesn't; the Xiaomi Mi CC9e is noticeably lighter (173g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1128
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4030 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mi CC9e better?
- Lighter: 173g vs 223g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 vs the Xiaomi Mi CC9e, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 53 points higher (89/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (100/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (90/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (70/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | Xiaomi Mi CC9e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.0" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 4030 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 9.0 (Pie); MIUI 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 153.5×71.9×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 173 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- 6.0" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- 4030 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO 16 and Xiaomi Mi CC9e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Xiaomi Mi CC9e by 1569.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (100/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (99/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (78/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (90/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (70/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e by 53 points (89/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Vivo iQOO 16 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 16 over the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.