Vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE Voyage 40 5G
VS
A full comparison of the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Voyage 40 5G is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Voyage 40 5G to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance
91
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
73
Portability
55
Value for money
82
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
Performance
—
Display
—
Camera
10
Battery
52
Portability
46
Value for money
—
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
What makes ZTE Voyage 40 5G better?
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 13 | ZTE Voyage 40 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc T7520 (Tanggula T760) | |
| AnTuTu | 3150555 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | — | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | 163.6×75.2×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | — | |
| Launch price | $650 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
10
cameraDisplay comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
displayZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Refresh rate: —
—
displayBattery and charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
73
batteryZTE Voyage 40 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
52
battery