Vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE Blade V40
The Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Blade V40 (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 49/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Vivo iQOO 13
ZTE Blade V40
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (78/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
- Lighter: 199g vs 207g
- Overall rating 49/100
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 13 vs the ZTE Blade V40, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 35 points higher (84/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 (78/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade V40 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 13 | ZTE Blade V40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | 165.8×77.2×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $650 | — |
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade V40
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade V40
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V40
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 (78/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 (73/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade V40 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade V40?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 by 35 points (84/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade V40?
The Vivo iQOO 13 has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the ZTE Blade V40 — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade V40?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 13 over the ZTE Blade V40?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V40 is a better fit for everyday use.