Vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE Blade V40 Pro
The Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 55/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro doesn't; the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 13
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 65W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
What makes ZTE Blade V40 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 190g vs 207g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 13 vs the ZTE Blade V40 Pro, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 29 points higher (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (73/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 13 | ZTE Blade V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3150555 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $650 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (73/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro by 29 points (84/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 13 has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 13 over the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.