Vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE Blade A76 4G

A full comparison of the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A76 4G to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO 13

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 82

ZTE Blade A76 4G

Performance —
Display 43
Camera 31
Battery 43
Portability —
Value for money —

What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?

  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 5W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

What makes ZTE Blade A76 4G better?

Comparison verdict

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO 13 ZTE Blade A76 4G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite —
AnTuTu 3150555 —
Geekbench Single 3013 —
Geekbench Multi 9287 —
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 1440x3168 720x1612
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 6150 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W 5W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP —
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) Android 15
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 IP54
Dimensions 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm —
Weight 207 g —
Launch price $650 —

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

ZTE Blade A76 4G

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: —
31
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

ZTE Blade A76 4G

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

ZTE Blade A76 4G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO 13

$650

ZTE Blade A76 4G

Price unknown