Vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE Blade A33S
The Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Blade A33S (2023) runs on the Spreadtrum Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 25/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 5 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A33S doesn't; the Vivo iQOO 13 is thinner (8.0mm vs 10.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 13
ZTE Blade A33S
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 207g vs 216g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 34/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A33S better?
- Overall rating 25/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 13 vs the ZTE Blade A33S, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 59 points higher (84/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (73/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (55/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 13 | ZTE Blade A33S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Spreadtrum Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3150555 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP52 | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | 160.0×78.0×10.0 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | $650 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A33S
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A33S
- 6.3" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A33S
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade A33S
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (99/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (73/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S (55/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade A33S?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A33S by 59 points (84/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 13 and the ZTE Blade A33S?
The Vivo iQOO 13 has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the ZTE Blade A33S — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 13 or the ZTE Blade A33S?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 13 over the ZTE Blade A33S?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.