Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 28/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 156,818); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S doesn't.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S by 43 points (71/100 vs 28/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S
Performance 8
Display 38
Camera 29
Battery 66
Portability 32
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S better?

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 156818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 723
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 8/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra scores 43 points higher (71/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (69/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (69/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (80/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (86/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (52/100 vs 32/100).

Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S: The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S is a better fit for everyday use.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 156818 1290942
Geekbench Single 233 1675
Geekbench Multi 723 4453
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 65W
Main camera 48 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10, HIOS 6.2 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1500 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 164.5×76.5×9.0 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 204 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
29
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
38
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S MediaTek Helio P22
28/100
156818 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +87.9%
1290942 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S by 87.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (69/100 vs 8/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (80/100 vs 38/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (86/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S (52/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S by 43 points (71/100 vs 28/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 29/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on performance (69/100 vs 8/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 S is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.