Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads — 26/100 vs 20/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably lighter (173g vs 207g).
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better camera (40/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 30/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Lighter: 173g vs 207g
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Vivo iQOO Z7 scores 6 points higher (26/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z7 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a bit better (36/100 vs 30/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (83/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 173 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z7 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a bit better (36/100 vs 30/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (83/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 edges out the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.