Tecno Spark Go 2 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Tecno Spark Go 2 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads — 34/100 vs 33/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Blade A75 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark Go 2 doesn't.
Tecno Spark Go 2
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Better Geekbench Single: 600 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1800 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 15W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (32/100 vs 27/100)
- Better display (55/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 59/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
Comparing the Tecno Spark Go 2 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the ZTE Blade A75 4G scores 1 points higher (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Spark Go 2 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark Go 2 is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Spark Go 2 (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark Go 2 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (62/100 vs 59/100).
| Specification | Tecno Spark Go 2 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 600 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1800 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 165.6×77.0×8.3 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $80 | — |
Tecno Spark Go 2
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Spark Go 2
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Spark Go 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Spark Go 2 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark Go 2 is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Spark Go 2 (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark Go 2 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (62/100 vs 59/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Spark Go 2 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G edges out the Tecno Spark Go 2 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark Go 2 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Tecno Spark Go 2 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark Go 2 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark Go 2 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Tecno Spark Go 2 leads on performance (32/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark Go 2 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Tecno Spark Go 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for everyday use.