Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
The Tecno Spark 50 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Spark 50 5G leads — 47/100 vs 44/100 (a 3-point difference).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
What makes Tecno Spark 50 5G better?
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Lighter: 195g vs 209g
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite better?
- Overall rating 44/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Spark 50 5G vs the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite, the Tecno Spark 50 5G scores 3 points higher (47/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G leads (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G is a bit better (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite (64/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | — | 167.4×77.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $179 | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G is a bit better (69/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite (64/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite?
The Tecno Spark 50 5G edges out the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 50 5G and the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite?
The Tecno Spark 50 5G has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite — 44/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 50 5G over the Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Tecno Spark 50 5G (64/100 vs 49/100).