Tecno Spark 40c vs Vivo X Fold6
The Tecno Spark 40c (2025) runs on the Helio G81, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $102 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 33/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 358,608); the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark 40c doesn't; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 40c
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Tecno Spark 40c better?
- Cheaper at launch: $102 vs $1900
- Overall rating 33/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1416
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Spark 40c vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 55 points higher (88/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 40c — 54/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (95/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (82/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (100/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 40c | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Helio G81 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 358608 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.6×77.0×8.4 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Launch price | $102 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 40c
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 40c
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 40c
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Spark 40c and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Tecno Spark 40c by 89.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1798. Tecno Spark 40c was $1798 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (95/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (87/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (82/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (100/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 40c or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c by 55 points (88/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 40c and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Tecno Spark 40c has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 40c or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 40c or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 40c over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.