Tecno Pova 5 Pro vs Vivo X300s
The Tecno Pova 5 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 567,996).
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
Vivo X300s
- Lighter: 212g vs 217g
- Overall rating 50/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 567996
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova 5 Pro vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro (94/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Tecno Pova 5 Pro are nearly equal (42/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova 5 Pro | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 567996 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HIOS 14 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 580 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.5×76.5×9.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 212 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
- Main: —
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Pova 5 Pro and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Tecno Pova 5 Pro by 84.7% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro (94/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro (94/100 vs 66/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro (83/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Tecno Pova 5 Pro are nearly equal (42/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 5 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 Pro by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 5 Pro and the Vivo X300s?
The Tecno Pova 5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 5 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 5 Pro over the Vivo X300s?
The Tecno Pova 5 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.