Tecno Pova 4 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Tecno Pova 4 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 45/100 vs 40/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 4 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo Y77 (China) is faster in AnTuTu (593,307 vs 554,590); the Tecno Pova 4 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 4
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Tecno Pova 4 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 593307 vs 554590
- Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2299 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 4 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 5 points higher (45/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Tecno Pova 4 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 4 is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (56/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 4 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 554590 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 170.6×77.5×8.7 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 4
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 4
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 4
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 4 and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y77 (China) leads Tecno Pova 4 by 6.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Tecno Pova 4 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (66/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 4 is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (56/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 4 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the Tecno Pova 4 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 4 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Tecno Pova 4 has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 4 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (66/100 vs 43/100).