Tecno Camon iACE2X vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11
The Tecno Camon iACE2X (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 22/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 3050); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 155,362); the Tecno Camon iACE2X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 210g).
Tecno Camon iACE2X
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Lighter: 150g vs 210g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 49/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 3050 mAh
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon iACE2X vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 54 points higher (76/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (92/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2X notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (78/100 vs 49/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon iACE2X | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 3154662 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 9494 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3050 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 148.3×71.9×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 150 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | — | $400 |
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- 3050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Tecno Camon iACE2X and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Tecno Camon iACE2X by 95.1% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Camon iACE2X
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (92/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (99/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (92/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2X notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (78/100 vs 49/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon iACE2X or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X by 54 points (76/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon iACE2X and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Tecno Camon iACE2X has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon iACE2X or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon iACE2X over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Tecno Camon iACE2X is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.