Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 64/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5200); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 879,714); per DXOMark lab testing, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the stronger camera (166 vs 138); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better portability (78/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 25 points higher (89/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (78/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 138 | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (97/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (93/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (80/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (78/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.