Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Xiaomi 18 Fold

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Xiaomi 18 Fold (2026) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O3; launch prices were $450 and $1639. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads — 86/100 vs 73/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 18 Fold has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 18 Fold is faster in AnTuTu (5,228,014 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 18 Fold is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

Xiaomi 18 Fold

Performance 99
Display 79
Camera 85
Battery 75
Portability 64
Value for money 80

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Faster charging: 70W vs 67W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 193g vs 219g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $1639

  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 64/100)

What makes Xiaomi 18 Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5228014 vs 1724757
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3715 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 14213 vs 4313
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (85/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Xiaomi 18 Fold, the Xiaomi 18 Fold scores 13 points higher (86/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (75/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Xiaomi 18 Fold — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Xiaomi 18 Fold (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (75/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Xiaomi 18 Fold are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).

Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Xiaomi 18 Fold: The Xiaomi 18 Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon 40 Premier Xiaomi 18 Fold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Xiaomi XRING O3
AnTuTu 1724757 5228014
Geekbench Single 1398 3715
Geekbench Multi 4313 14213
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 7.6" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1672x2364
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5100 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 70W 67W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP59
Dimensions 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm 159.7×145.1×5.0 mm
Weight 193 g 219 g
Launch price $450 $1639

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
85
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • 7.6" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1672x2364
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • Wireless: 50W
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Xiaomi 18 Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100
1724757 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 18 Fold Xiaomi XRING O3
86/100 +67.0%
5228014 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 18 Fold leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 67.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Xiaomi 18 Fold

$1639

Launch price difference: $1189. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $1189 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (99/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Xiaomi 18 Fold (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (75/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Xiaomi 18 Fold are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Xiaomi 18 Fold is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Xiaomi 18 Fold — 86/100.

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Xiaomi 18 Fold leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Xiaomi 18 Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.