Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 30 5G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 52/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 644,203); the Tecno Camon 30 5G is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 30 5G better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better portability (61/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 644203
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 912
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2244
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 30 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 37 points higher (89/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G (97/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 5G notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (61/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 644203 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 912 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2244 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×75.9×7.8 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 30 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 30 5G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 30 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 30 5G and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 30 5G by 82.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G (97/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G (93/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G (80/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 5G notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (61/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 30 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 5G by 37 points (89/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 30 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 30 5G has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 30 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 30 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 30 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.