Tecno Camon 16 vs Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
The Tecno Camon 16 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads — 31/100 vs 19/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 16 doesn't.
Tecno Camon 16
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better camera (37/100 vs 34/100)
- Lighter: 194g vs 207g
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 16 vs the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China), the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) scores 12 points higher (31/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and the Tecno Camon 16 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (57/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 16 | Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | 650 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 164.0×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Camon 16
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Camon 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 16
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and the Tecno Camon 16 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (57/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 16 or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 16 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 16 and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 16 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 16 over the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.