Tecno Camon 16 S vs ZTE Axon 40 pro

The Tecno Camon 16 S (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 28/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 156,818); the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 16 S doesn't.

The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S by 30 points (58/100 vs 28/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 16 S
Performance 8
Display 38
Camera 29
Battery 66
Portability 32
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 pro
Performance 61
Display 89
Camera 44
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Tecno Camon 16 S better?

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 156818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 723
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (61/100 vs 8/100)
  • Better camera (44/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 16 S vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 30 points higher (58/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (61/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (89/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (44/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (52/100 vs 32/100).

Tecno Camon 16 S: The Tecno Camon 16 S is a better fit for everyday use.
ZTE Axon 40 pro: The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Camon 16 S ZTE Axon 40 pro
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
AnTuTu 156818 1010069
Geekbench Single 233 1298
Geekbench Multi 723 3520
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1080x2400
Refresh rate 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 65W
Main camera 48 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 10, HIOS 6.2 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 164.5×76.5×9.0 mm 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm
Weight 199 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 16 S
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
29
camera
ZTE Axon 40 pro
  • Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
44
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 16 S
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
38
display
ZTE Axon 40 pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 16 S
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
ZTE Axon 40 pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 16 S and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 16 S MediaTek Helio P22
28/100
156818 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
58/100 +84.5%
1010069 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Tecno Camon 16 S by 84.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (61/100 vs 8/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (89/100 vs 38/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (44/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (52/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S by 30 points (58/100 vs 28/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 16 S and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The Tecno Camon 16 S has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 29/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 8/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 16 S over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The Tecno Camon 16 S is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.