Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 16 Pro (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 35/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 317,084); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 16 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Camon 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (207g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 16 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 207g vs 225g
- Better camera (43/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 317084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 417
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1345
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 40 points higher (75/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro (95/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro (99/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 16 Pro | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | — | $548 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 16 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 91.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro (95/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro (99/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 40 points (75/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 16 Pro leads on camera score (43/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 16 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.