Tecno Camon 12 Pro vs ZTE Avid 589

The Tecno Camon 12 Pro (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the ZTE Avid 589 (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro leads — 25/100 vs 19/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 12 Pro has the bigger battery (3500 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 8 MP.

The Tecno Camon 12 Pro edges out the ZTE Avid 589 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon 12 Pro

Performance 10
Display 65
Camera 19
Battery 15
Portability 84
Value for money —

ZTE Avid 589

Performance 10
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 80
Value for money —

What makes Tecno Camon 12 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 3500 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 16MP vs 8MP
  • Lighter: 161g vs 167g

  • Better camera (19/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (65/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better portability (84/100 vs 80/100)

What makes ZTE Avid 589 better?


  • Overall rating 19/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 12 Pro vs the ZTE Avid 589, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro scores 6 points higher (25/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (65/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro is a bit better (19/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 15/100. In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro and the ZTE Avid 589 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon 12 Pro ZTE Avid 589
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 MediaTek Helio P22
AnTuTu 177554 177554
Geekbench Single 233 233
Geekbench Multi 723 723
Display 6.3" AMOLED 5.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1600 720x1440
Refresh rate — —
Battery 3500 mAh 3000 mAh
Charging — —
Main camera 16 MP 8 MP
Front camera 32 MP 2 MP
RAM 6GB 2GB
Storage 64GB 32GB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie); HIOS 5.5 Android 11 (Go edition)
NFC no no
Dimensions 158.6×75.5×7.8 mm 142.2×70.9×7.9 mm
Weight 161 g 167 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon 12 Pro

  • Main: 16MP
  • Front: 32MP
19
camera

ZTE Avid 589

  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 2MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon 12 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
65
display

ZTE Avid 589

  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon 12 Pro

  • 3500 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

ZTE Avid 589

  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 12 Pro and ZTE Avid 589, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 12 Pro MediaTek Helio P22
25/100
177554 AnTuTu
ZTE Avid 589 MediaTek Helio P22
19/100
177554 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (65/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro is a bit better (19/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 15/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro and the ZTE Avid 589 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon 12 Pro or the ZTE Avid 589?

The Tecno Camon 12 Pro edges out the ZTE Avid 589 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 12 Pro and the ZTE Avid 589?

The Tecno Camon 12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Avid 589 — 19/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 12 Pro or the ZTE Avid 589?

The Tecno Camon 12 Pro leads on camera score (19/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 12 Pro over the ZTE Avid 589?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (65/100 vs 42/100).