TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16
The TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 51/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 879,714); the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro is noticeably lighter (208g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro better?
- Lighter: 208g vs 223g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 38 points higher (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 900 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 169.4×80.1×8.0 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (99/100 vs 64/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro (90/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro by 38 points (89/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the TCL NxtPaper 70 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.