TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER vs Vivo X300 Pro

The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $449 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 57/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 956,756).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 30 points (87/100 vs 57/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
Performance 57
Display 63
Camera 61
Battery 50
Portability 47
Value for money 46
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $899

  • Better portability (47/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 956756
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 226g vs 227g

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 63/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 30 points higher (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 50/100). Value score: TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER — 46/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER: The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 956756 3258010
Geekbench Single 1061 3228
Geekbench Multi 3185 9553
Display 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 33W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 850 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 227 g 226 g
Launch price $449 $899
Camera comparison
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
  • 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
63
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER MediaTek Dimensity 7400
57/100
956756 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +70.6%
3258010 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 70.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
$449
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $450. TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (93/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (84/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (96/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (81/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 30 points (87/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.