TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $449 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads — 65/100 vs 57/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,052,566 vs 953,150); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is noticeably lighter (212g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo edges out the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

Performance 57
Display 63
Camera 61
Battery 50
Portability 47
Value for money 38

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

Performance 76
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 71
Portability 51
Value for money 80

What makes TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER better?


  • Better camera (61/100 vs 32/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2052566 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 7620 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 212g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $449

  • Higher performance (76/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (71/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 47/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo scores 8 points higher (65/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads (61/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 50/100). Value score: TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER — 38/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (94/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (61/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (71/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 MediaTek Dimensity 8400
AnTuTu 953150 2052566
Geekbench Single 1061 1579
Geekbench Multi 3185 6100
Display 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7620 mAh
Charging 33W 90W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 850 nits 4400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP65
Dimensions 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm
Weight 227 g 212 g
Launch price $449 $250

Camera comparison

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

  • 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
63
display

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 7620 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery

Overall performance score

We compared TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER MediaTek Dimensity 7400
57/100
953150 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 8400
65/100 +53.6%
2052566 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 53.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

$449

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

$250

Launch price difference: $199. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo was $199 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (76/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (94/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (61/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (71/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo edges out the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads on camera score (61/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads on performance (76/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.