Sony Xperia 5 IV vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Sony Xperia 5 IV (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $799 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 67/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 1,242,193); the Sony Xperia 5 IV is noticeably lighter (172g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Sony Xperia 5 IV — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Performance 68
Display 84
Camera 56
Battery 66
Portability 74
Value for money 46
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Sony Xperia 5 IV better?
  • Lighter: 172g vs 215g

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 1242193
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $599 vs $799

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Sony Xperia 5 IV vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 19 points higher (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Sony Xperia 5 IV notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (74/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (84/100 vs 46/100).

Sony Xperia 5 IV: The Sony Xperia 5 IV is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Sony Xperia 5 IV Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1242193 3740528
Geekbench Single 1675 3041
Geekbench Multi 4453 9494
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2520 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 119
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 156.0×67.0×8.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 172 g 215 g
Price $799 $599
Camera comparison
Sony Xperia 5 IV
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
56
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Sony Xperia 5 IV
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Sony Xperia 5 IV
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
66
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Sony Xperia 5 IV and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
67/100
1242193 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +66.8%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Sony Xperia 5 IV by 66.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Sony Xperia 5 IV
$799
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Price difference: $200. Vivo iQOO 15 is cheaper by $200.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (94/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (99/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (78/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (85/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Sony Xperia 5 IV notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (74/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (84/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sony Xperia 5 IV or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Sony Xperia 5 IV — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Sony Xperia 5 IV and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Sony Xperia 5 IV has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Sony Xperia 5 IV or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the Sony Xperia 5 IV or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Sony Xperia 5 IV over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Sony Xperia 5 IV is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.