Sharp Aquos R9 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R9 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $599 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 68/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,660,924); the Sharp Aquos R9 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R9
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 225g
- Better camera (60/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1660924
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5045
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $599
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 90/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R9 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 7 points higher (75/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 leads (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Sharp Aquos R9 — 50/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (95/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R9 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 1660924 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1860 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5045 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R9
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R9
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R9
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R9 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R9 by 53.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $51. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $51 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (95/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (60/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (80/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra edges out the Sharp Aquos R9 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R9 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R9 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R9 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.