Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Sony Xperia 1 V
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Sony Xperia 1 V (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; estimated prices are $2899 and $900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 43/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 48 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,761,879); the Sony Xperia 1 V is noticeably lighter (187g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Sony Xperia 1 V
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1761879
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Lighter: 187g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $900 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (66/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (48/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Sony Xperia 1 V, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 14 points higher (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Sony Xperia 1 V leads (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 1 V (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 1 V (49/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Sony Xperia 1 V significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (66/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Sony Xperia 1 V significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Sony Xperia 1 V | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1761879 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 5311 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" OLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1644x3840 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 30W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 165.0×71.0×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 187 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $900 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Sony Xperia 1 V
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sony Xperia 1 V
- 6.5" OLED
- Resolution: 1644x3840
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Sony Xperia 1 V
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Sony Xperia 1 V, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Sony Xperia 1 V by 66.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1999. Sony Xperia 1 V is cheaper by $1999.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 1 V (67/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 1 V (49/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Sony Xperia 1 V significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (66/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Sony Xperia 1 V significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Sony Xperia 1 V?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Sony Xperia 1 V — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Sony Xperia 1 V?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Sony Xperia 1 V — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Sony Xperia 1 V?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Sony Xperia 1 V?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Sony Xperia 1 V?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Sony Xperia 1 V is a better fit for everyday use.