Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Vivo Y31d

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y31d (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2; estimated prices are $1999 and $185. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads — 61/100 vs 33/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y31d has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 522,680); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y31d doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.4mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d by 28 points (61/100 vs 33/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 76
Battery 25
Design 31
Value for money 0
Vivo Y31d
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 57
Design 26
Value for money 97
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 522680
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 489
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 1532
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 215g vs 219g

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (31/100 vs 26/100)
What makes Vivo Y31d better?
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 25W
  • Cheaper: $185 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (57/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs the Vivo Y31d, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 28 points higher (61/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (57/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (76/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (57/100 vs 25/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (31/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (97/100 vs 0/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo Y31d: The Vivo Y31d is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Vivo Y31d
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
AnTuTu 3065623 522680
Geekbench Single 2910 489
Geekbench Multi 9174 1532
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 2184x1968 720x1570
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 25W 44W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 145
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 1250 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP48 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm
Weight 215 g 219 g
Price $1999 $185
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera
Vivo Y31d
  • Main: 50MP f/f/2.0
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y31d
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1570
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
25
battery
Vivo Y31d
  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Vivo Y31d, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
61/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Vivo Y31d Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
33/100 -486.5%
522680 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Vivo Y31d by 486.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
$1999
Vivo Y31d
$185

Price difference: $1814. Vivo Y31d is cheaper by $1814.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (76/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (57/100 vs 25/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (31/100 vs 26/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (97/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo Y31d?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d by 28 points (61/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Vivo Y31d?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo Y31d — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo Y31d?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo Y31d?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 over the Vivo Y31d?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo Y31d is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.