Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Tecno Pova 6
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Tecno Pova 6 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 36/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Tecno Pova 6
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 35/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Tecno Pova 6, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 1 points higher (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 leads (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 6 leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 (81/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Tecno Pova 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 70W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 14, HIOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | — | 166.2×76.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 206 g | |
| Price | — | $200 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova 6
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 6
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 6
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 (81/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (58/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Tecno Pova 6?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Tecno Pova 6 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Tecno Pova 6?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Tecno Pova 6 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Tecno Pova 6?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Tecno Pova 6?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Pova 6 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.