Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads — 75/100 vs 58/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has the bigger battery (5020 mAh vs 3900); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is faster in AnTuTu (3,034,849 vs 1,135,878); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably lighter (163g vs 317g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 73
Battery 29
Portability 97
Value for money 60

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

Performance 64
Display 67
Camera 51
Battery 53
Portability 40
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3034849 vs 1135878
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2970 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9490 vs 3537
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 163g vs 317g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (73/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (97/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold better?

  • Bigger battery: 5020 vs 3900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 67W vs 25W

  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 29/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge scores 17 points higher (75/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold leads (53/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (53/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (97/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold: The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3034849 1135878
Geekbench Single 2970 1500
Geekbench Multi 9490 3537
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 8.0" Foldable AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1860x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 3900 mAh 5020 mAh
Charging 25W 67W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 140 —
Main camera 200 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 12 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 10, MIUI 12
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 158.2×75.6×5.8 mm —
Weight 163 g 317 g
Launch price $1099 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
51
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

  • 8.0" Foldable AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1860x2480
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

  • 3900 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
29
battery

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

  • 5020 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3034849 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
58/100 -167.2%
1135878 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold by 167.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

$1099

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (91/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (89/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (73/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (53/100 vs 29/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (97/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads on camera score (73/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads on performance (91/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge over the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is a better fit for active users.