Samsung Galaxy S22+ vs ZTE Axon 40
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. Both devices score the same overall rating of 58/100. Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 1,010,069).
Samsung Galaxy S22+
ZTE Axon 40
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 1298
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 3520
- Lighter: 196g vs 200g
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 53/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (51/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ and the ZTE Axon 40 received the same MobileRank rating — 58/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit better (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit better (79/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S22+ | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1290942 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1675 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4453 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $999 | — |
Samsung Galaxy S22+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Samsung Galaxy S22+
- 6.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S22+
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy S22+ and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ leads ZTE Axon 40 by 27.8% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit better (69/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit better (79/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S22+ or the ZTE Axon 40?
Both devices scored 58/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy S22+.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S22+ and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S22+ or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S22+ or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ leads on performance (69/100 vs 61/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S22+ over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.