Samsung Galaxy S21+ vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ (2021) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2100, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $999 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 57/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,017,773); the Samsung Galaxy S21+ is noticeably lighter (200g vs 223g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S21+

Performance 62
Display 79
Camera 42
Battery 48
Portability 60
Value for money 24

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S21+ better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 223g

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1017773
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1435
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 3555
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $999

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S21+ vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 32 points higher (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S21+ — 24/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (100/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (90/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy S21+: The Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S21+ Vivo iQOO 16
Processor Samsung Exynos 2100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 1017773 5498720
Geekbench Single 1435 4327
Geekbench Multi 3555 12873
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 17
Brightness (peak) — 6000 nits
NFC — yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions — 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 200 g 223 g
Launch price $999 $840

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S21+

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 10MP
42
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S21+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S21+

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
48
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S21+ and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100
57/100
1017773 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +81.5%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 81.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S21+

$999

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Launch price difference: $159. Vivo iQOO 16 was $159 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (100/100 vs 62/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (90/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S21+ and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S21+ over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.