Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $699 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 907,140); the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is noticeably lighter (190g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy S20 FE better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $840
- Better portability (60/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 907140
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S20 FE — 14/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (100/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (78/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (90/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 907140 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1222 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3060 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.8×74.5×8.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy S20 FE by 83.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $141. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE was $141 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (100/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (78/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (90/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 26/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.