Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 51/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 978,910); the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 223g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 978910
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1169
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 3191
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 38 points higher (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (100/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (78/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (90/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 978910 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1169 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3191 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.8×74.5×8.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 by 82.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (100/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (78/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 (90/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 by 38 points (89/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 26/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.