Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 51/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M35 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 767,711).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M35
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy M35 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 51/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 767711
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 2710
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 218g vs 222g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (46/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M35 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 29 points higher (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M35 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (46/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 767711 | 3128552 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2710 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M35 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M35 by 75.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M35
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (92/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (81/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M35 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (46/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 by 29 points (80/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.